Managing Communication Preferences in Healthcare: Best Practices for Patient Engagement

April 23, 2024

Effective communication is more than just a necessity—it’s a cornerstone of exceptional patient care. Patients and members receiving healthcare services depend on their providers for solutions, support, and care. Establishing a relationship based on trust, consistency, and communication is vital between healthcare organizations and their clientele. Frequent, consistent, and personalized communication from healthcare providers holds increasing significance, and the opportunity for healthcare organizations to leverage technology in facilitating communication in secure, acceptable, and appropriate manners is large.  


As technology advances and patient expectations evolve, healthcare providers must adopt strategies that cater to diverse communication needs.


Why Managing Communication Preferences Matters in

Healthcare

Patient communication preferences vary widely—some prefer traditional methods like phone calls or letters, while others favor modern channels such as email, text messages, or patient portals. Catering to these preferences is crucial for:

  • Enhancing Patient Satisfaction: Personalized communication builds trust and strengthens the provider-patient relationship.
  • Improving Health Outcomes: Timely and tailored messages can encourage patients to follow treatment plans and attend appointments.
  • Ensuring Compliance: Adhering to regulations like HIPAA is easier when communication aligns with patient consent.


Providing transparency and enabling a two-way dialogue about communications, privacy, data use, and personalization can make all the difference between good versus great healthcare experiences. From ensuring patients receive crucial medical information to facilitating seamless interactions between healthcare providers and employer groups, managing communication preferences is a multifaceted challenge that requires careful consideration and strategic planning. 


Complexities of Healthcare Preference Centers 


Healthcare preference centers are central hubs for managing communication preferences and delivering personalized messaging to stakeholders. However, building and maintaining a robust preference center comes with its own set of complexities. Healthcare organizations must invest in sophisticated technology platforms capable of securely managing sensitive data, complying with privacy regulations, and integrating with existing systems and workflows


Consumers should be able to manage various channel preferences (e.g., email, SMS, mail) in different channels as well (e.g. over the phone, via email, through an online preference center). All these various channels and preferences need to talk to each other, making a centralized preference center crucial to manage updates accurately and effectively. 


Additionally, designing a user-friendly interface that allows stakeholders to easily update their communication preferences requires careful attention to usability and accessibility. Providing clear instructions, intuitive navigation, and options for customization ensures that stakeholders can effectively manage their preferences and receive relevant communications. 


Stakeholders to Consider When Designing a Preference Center 


When starting a preference center project, keep in mind the purpose of these preferences should be mutually beneficial between the customer/prospect and your organization. Here are common stakeholders to consider when designing: 


External Stakeholders


  1. Patients and members: Healthcare patients and members share unique communication preferences and may require tailored messaging based on their health status, demographics, and preferences. Providing consumers with the ability to customize their communication preferences empowers them to receive relevant information in their preferred format and frequency. 
  2. Employer groups: Employer groups play a significant role in healthcare communication, especially for employer-sponsored health plans. HR departments are responsible for disseminating important healthcare information to employees, such as benefits enrollment, wellness programs, and plan updates. Effective communication with employer groups and HR departments is essential for ensuring that employees have access to the information and resources they need to make informed healthcare decisions. 
  3. Providers: Clear and effective communication channels from hospitals and insurance companies to doctors are indispensable in navigating the intricacies of the healthcare system and ensuring optimal care for patients. Payers play a pivotal role in messaging providers and their staff to advocate for initiatives such as value-based care, convey updates on network changes, and facilitate contracts for new lines of business. It's essential for hospital networks to efficiently and transparently reach providers working within their system, delivering pertinent information to support the diverse needs of their patient population. Strong communication fosters collaboration, enhances decision-making, and ultimately elevates the quality of care delivered to patients. 


Internal Stakeholders


  1. Marketing:  To market to customers, marketing teams need consent for channels, like email, SMS, phone, mail, as well as for products or specific topics. When a preference center is optimized, your marketing team can gain effectiveness, improved legal compliance, more leads and better customer experience scores, while minimizing poorly targeted communications.
  2. Sales:  Sales teams often focus on consent for phone and email for product outreach. Accessing this data, without a centralized preference center, is difficult and frequently incomplete. Like marketing, your sales teams can gain call effectiveness and increased conversion rates with a well-designed preference center. 
  3. Customer service:  Customer service must also have consent for email, mail, phone, SMS, and certain web/portal activity. This applies not only to customer service-related activities, but to also marketing and sales preferences, as the customer service team is likely the first in line to address updates and requests regarding communications. The processes to collect and access this information can be complicated and challenging to train. By using a centralized preference center powered by your CRM, organizations can streamline and reduce the costs to communicate with customers. 

 

Tailored Communications Can Drive Improved Health Outcomes 


By implementing a centralized preference center and prioritizing effective communication strategies, healthcare organizations can enhance patient engagement, improve health outcomes, and drive positive behavior change. Tailoring communications to individual preferences and needs allows healthcare organizations to deliver targeted messaging that resonates with stakeholders, leading to increased satisfaction and engagement. 


Effective communication plays a crucial role in delivering high-quality healthcare and improving patient outcomes. Clear and timely communication between healthcare providers and patients fosters trust, enhances patient satisfaction, and promotes adherence to treatment plans. It also helps to prevent medical errors, reduce hospital readmissions, and streamline care coordination. 


For employer-sponsored healthcare plans, communication between healthcare organizations, employer groups, members, and HR departments is essential for efficiently managing benefits, addressing employee concerns, and promoting wellness initiatives. 


Complex, Yet Essential


Managing communication preferences in healthcare is a complex yet essential project on any healthcare organization’s CRM roadmap. By carefully considering the diverse needs of stakeholders, leveraging advanced technology solutions, and prioritizing effective communication strategies, healthcare organizations can foster meaningful connections, improve patient outcomes, and drive positive change in the healthcare landscape. 


Contact us to begin your evolution.

INSIGHTS

By Carly Whitte March 4, 2026
Learn how to build self-serve AI analytics dashboards in CRM. Quick wins, best practices, and expert tips to empower sales and service teams 
By Carly Whitte February 24, 2026
Discover the four levels of AI readiness and assess where your organization stands. Learn how to move from experimentation to scalable, responsible AI adoption.
February 16, 2026
As organizations head into 2026, the conversation around artificial intelligence (AI) is changing. The early years of AI adoption were dominated by experimentation. Proofs of concept multiplied. Vendors promised transformation. Internal teams explored use cases in pockets across the organization. Yet for many enterprises, the results have been uneven at best. In 2026, AI success is more than access to advanced models or cutting-edge tools and will be driven by execution. Organizations that struggle with AI rarely lack ambition but instead lack the structure and organizational readiness. Here’s what you can expect to see in 2026. Agentic AI Goes Beyond Experimentation Agentic AI is often described as the next frontier: AI systems that can reason, plan, and take action autonomously. In theory, this represents a major leap forward. In practice, 2026 will expose a hard truth: autonomy without discipline or readiness creates risk faster than value. The most effective organizations will deploy agentic AI deliberately within clearly defined operational boundaries. Agentic AI will increasingly be used to coordinate workflows, surface decision options, and manage repetitive execution across systems, while humans retain ownership over judgment and accountability. The intelligence of the agent matters far less than how well it is integrated into existing processes and platforms. When agentic AI operates outside governed systems of record, organizations lose visibility, auditability, and trust. When it is embedded directly into the operating model, it strengthens execution and amplifies impact instead of introducing risk. In practice, we are already seeing this distinction play out. One organization attempted to deploy autonomous agents across customer operations without clear escalation paths or system boundaries, quickly creating confusion and rework. Another embedded agentic AI narrowly within its CRM workflows to triage cases, surface next-best actions, and route work, reducing cycle time while preserving human accountability. The difference was the discipline of its deployment and readiness of the company . In 2026, agentic AI will succeed quietly inside workflows , under guardrails, and in service of execution rather than experimentation. The Shift from Models to Systems The advantage of having access to the most advanced AI model will be minimal. Models will improve, but they will also become more interchangeable. The differentiator will be the system surrounding them. Organizations that see real returns from AI will focus on how data moves, how decisions are made, and how outcomes are measured. AI does not operate in isolation. It inherits the strengths and weaknesses of the environment in which it is deployed. At KKC, we often see AI initiatives stall because foundational questions were never addressed. Data may exist, but not be trusted. Platforms may be implemented, but not integrated. Processes may be documented, but not followed. AI simply exposes these gaps faster. We frequently see organizations using the same AI tools achieve radically different outcomes. In one case, two teams implemented similar predictive capabilities. One struggled due to inconsistent data definitions and disconnected platforms. The other succeeded by first aligning data ownership, integrating systems of record, and defining how insights would be acted upon. The technology was identical. The system was not. In 2026, the most successful AI programs will be built on strong systems thinking. They will prioritize reliability over novelty and consistency over speed. These organizations may appear slower at first, but they will compound value over time while others reset their strategy yet again. Governance and Accountability Take Center Stage AI governance is now a practical requirement. As AI moves deeper into decision-making, organizations will face growing pressure to explain how outcomes are generated, who is responsible for them, and how risks are managed. This pressure will come not only from regulators, but from customers, boards, and internal teams who expect clarity and control. Effective governance doesn’t limit innovation; it enables it to scale safely. Organizations that invest in clear ownership models, defined approval paths, and ongoing monitoring will move faster because they eliminate uncertainty and rework. In regulated and complex environments, governance determines speed. Organizations without clear ownership stall decisions while debating risk. Those with defined approval models, monitoring, and escalation paths move faster because teams know exactly how to proceed. Governance removes friction while not slowing AI down. In 2026, governance will be recognized as infrastructure instead of overhead. AI Readiness Is No Longer Just Technical One of the most underestimated shifts heading into 2026 is the recognition that AI readiness is as much about people as it is about technology. Many organizations underestimate the cultural impact of AI. Teams may distrust outputs they do not understand. Leaders may struggle to explain how AI fits into decision-making. Employees may fear replacement rather than augmentation. When these concerns are not addressed, adoption stalls, even when the technology works. In several organizations we’ve observed, AI tools technically performed as designed but were quietly ignored. Teams lacked confidence in outputs, managers hesitated to rely on recommendations, and adoption plateaued. Where leaders invested in education, role clarity, and communication, usage increased without changing the underlying technology. Organizations that succeed in 2026 will invest intentionally in education, communication, and change management. They will articulate not just what AI does, but why it exists and how it supports human decision-making. They will prepare leaders to lead differently and teams to work differently. AI is success often depends more on the operating model shift than the actual technology rollout. From AI Theater to Real Outcomes By 2026, patience for AI initiatives without measurable impact will be gone. Executives will expect clear business cases, defined success metrics, and visible progress. AI strategies will increasingly resemble other enterprise transformation efforts grounded in financial outcomes, operational efficiency, and long-term scalability. At KKC, we help organizations move beyond AI theater by focusing on where AI creates tangible value and where it does not. Not every process should be automated. Not every decision should involve AI. Disciplined prioritization will be a competitive advantage. We see many organizations measure AI progress by the number of pilots launched. The more successful ones measure it by decisions improved, hours saved, or revenue protected. In 2026, output metrics will replace activity metrics, and many AI programs will not survive that transition. The organizations that thrive will stop chasing AI for its own sake and start using it as a tool to strengthen execution. What 2026 Will Really Reward AI will continue to evolve rapidly. The organizations that benefit most from it will be the most prepared. In 2026, advantage will belong to organizations that: Build systems, not experiments Treat governance as an enabler Invest in readiness, not just tools Focus on execution over ambition AI has moved beyond proving what is possible. The focus now is delivering what matters consistently, at scale, and with confidence. Organizations that make this shift will define the next generation of AI leaders. At Kona Kai Corporation, we help organizations make that shift. We bring structure to AI initiatives that feel fragmented, turn ambition into executable roadmaps, and help teams move from pilots to real business impact. If your organization is ready to move beyond experimentation and into execution, 2026 is the year to do it, intentionally .
By Carly Whitte February 6, 2026
Celebrating 20 years of digital transformation success, Kona Kai Corporation has helped organizations navigate technology change, drive measurable business outcomes, and evolve from early CRM and process optimization to AI-driven solutions grounded in people, governance, and real results.
By Carly Whitte January 2, 2026
AI can deliver real value in 2026 for organizations with the right foundations. Explore AI readiness, proven use cases, and scalable adoption strategies.
By Carly Whitte December 31, 2025
Enterprises are adopting agentic AI, but success requires governance, readiness, data integrity, and human oversight. Build trust and scale with control.
By Carly Whitte December 30, 2025
Most AI programs fail from readiness gaps, not technology. Discover how to assess data, processes, governance, and platforms for scalable AI success.
By Carly Whitte December 5, 2025
Learn how to prepare your operations team to manage and monitor AI agents effectively. Explore key frameworks for governance, lifecycle management, and human–agent collaboration.
By Carly Whitte December 4, 2025
Learn how to design emotionally intelligent AI systems that combine empathy and accuracy. Build trust, prevent harm, and elevate customer experience.
By Carly Whitte November 27, 2025
Discover how a CRM-powered Digital Front Door transforms patient experience by connecting every touchpoint into a seamless, personalized journey. Learn how healthcare organizations can improve engagement, strengthen loyalty, and deliver coordinated care that builds long-term trust.